Home

Challenges and Limits of Reverse Hashing Modern Cryptographic Hashes

49 views

Reverse hashing refers to the process of finding the original input data that was used to generate a given hash value. Essentially, it aims to reverse the one-way function of a hash algorithm. However, this task is extraordinarily difficult for modern cryptographic hash functions designed with security in mind, such as SHA-256, SHA-3, or bcrypt.

Hash functions are intentionally designed to be one-way: easy to compute in the forward direction (from input message to hash value) but infeasible to reverse due to collisions and avalanche effects. Collisions occur when two different inputs produce the same hash, and good hash functions make these collisions highly unlikely. The avalanche effect ensures that small changes in input yield significantly different hashes.

Methods to Attempt Reverse Hashing

  1. Brute Force Attack:

    • Description: Involves trying all possible inputs until one matches the hash.
    • Challenges: Extremely time-consuming and computationally expensive, especially for robust hash functions with longer output lengths (e.g., SHA-256 which has a 256-bit output).

  2. Rainbow Tables:

    • Description: Precomputed tables of hash-initial value pairs, designed to expedite the reverse hashing of hashes.
    • Challenges: Consumes vast amounts of storage and becomes obsolete with the use of salts (random data added to the input of a hash function).

  3. Dictionary Attack:

    • Description: Uses a list of likely inputs (like common passwords) to check against the hash.
    • Challenges: Ineffective against complex or random inputs and adding salts further complicates this process.

Limits and Protections

  • Salting: Appending a unique, random piece of data to each password before hashing it. This means identical passwords will have unique hashes, neutralizing the effectiveness of precomputed attacks like rainbow tables.
  • Pepper: Adding a secret value to the hash input that is not stored with the record, conceivably adding a layer of obscurity.
  • Iterative Hashing: Repetitive application of a hash function (key-stretching methods, such as PBKDF2, bcrypt, or Argon2) increases the time required to compute each hash and thus the time required to perform a reverse attack.

Conclusion

Reverse hashing is impractically hard and not the intended use of hash functions. Strong cryptographic hash functions, alongside techniques like salting, peppering, and iterative hashing, make reversing a hash infeasible within a reasonable timeframe using current technology.